Coros Pace 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 265. When comparing the styles of the Coros Pace 3 and the Garmin Forerunner 265, consider several key aspects. Both watches offer lightweight and compact designs, making them easy to wear during workouts.
The most notable difference lies in the case sizes. The Garmin Forerunner 265 offers two sizes (265 and 265S), allowing users to choose a larger case if preferred. Conversely, the Coros Pace 3 provides only a single case size.
Regarding display style, the Garmin Forerunner 265 features an AMOLED display, offering a vibrant, smartwatch-like experience. On the other hand, the Coros Pace 3 uses an LCD display, which prioritizes viewing angles and battery life.
The display type impacts battery longevity. The AMOLED display on the Garmin Forerunner 265, particularly in Always-On mode, consumes more battery compared to the Coros Pace 3’s LCD display. Nevertheless, both watches manage about a week’s worth of workouts on a single charge.
Both watches include touchscreen capabilities, but they activate differently. The Garmin Forerunner 265’s touchscreen functionality is available right out of the box, whereas users must activate the touchscreen feature on the Coros Pace 3.
Table of Contents
Coros Pace 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 265 Specs
| Coros Pace 3 | Forerunner 265 | |
|---|---|---|
| $ | $229.00 | $449.45 |
| Brand | Coros | Garmin |
| Dimension | 41.9 x 41.9 x 13 mm | 46.1 x 46.1 x 12.9 mm |
| Material | Fiber-reinforced polymer | fiber-reinforced polymer |
| Weight | 30 grams | 47 grams |
| Display | 1.2 inch | 1.3″ AMOLED |
| Resolution | 240 x 240 pixels | 416 x 416 pixels |
Design and Display
Coros Pace 3: Comes in a single case size with an LCD display that also supports touchscreen functionality (needs to be enabled). The display is more traditional for sports watches, focusing on readability and battery efficiency.
Garmin Forerunner 265: Offers two case size options (265 and 265S) for a more customized fit and features an AMOLED touchscreen display out-of-the-box. The AMOLED display provides a vibrant, smartwatch-like experience, especially in always-on mode.
Run Tracking Experience
GPS Accuracy, Heart Rate Monitoring Performance: Both watches provide exact GPS tracking as well as accurate wrist-based monitoring of heart rate. They also offer the option of pairing with heart rate sensors from an external source to provide more precise information.
Navigation Support and Route upload Capabilities: If you are looking for navigation Both watches have breadcrumb navigation that allows users to follow preloaded routes. It is also possible to upload your routes through the respective apps. But neither watch has the full support for mapping.
Training and Analysis Features: Both watches provide extensive training and analysis features. You can review your workouts, monitor the progress of your workout, and set goals with both watches. However, the way you use these functions may differ. However, the Garmin Forerunner 265 offers a more user-friendly and intuitive approach and features like training readiness and daily recommended exercises.
User-Friendliness and Intelligence: In terms of user-friendliness, Garmin Forerunner 265 has a slight advantage. It has a more intuitive interface, and is easier to navigate through the menus, settings and other options. Coros Pace 3 is a more intuitive interface. Coros Pace 3, while still user-friendly, could require some effort to understand and use all of the features.
Overall satisfaction with the overall satisfaction with Tracking Experience: Both watches offer a satisfying running experience that includes precise data and useful features. If budget is your top goal then it is the Coros Pace 3 offers excellent performance, but at a lower price. However If you’re looking for the latest features in your smartwatch and are prepared to pay more for a model and Garmin Forerunner 265 is an excellent option.
Smartwatch Support
Compatibility Android and iOS: The Coros Pace 3 and the Garmin Forerunner 265 are compatible with both Android and iOS devices. This means that regardless of the type of phone you own, you will be able to quickly connect and sync your watch with your phone.
Comparison between Notification Player and Viewing Capabilities
In terms of viewing notifications as well as using music players Garmin Forerunner 265 is the best choice. Garmin Forerunner 265 offers a more sophisticated smartwatch experience as in comparison to Coros Pace 3. Coros Pace 3. With the Garmin Forerunner 265, you can check and respond to notifications right via your watch, allowing greater convenience and efficiency. In addition it’s the Garmin Forerunner 265 supports streaming services such as Spotify which lets you listen to your music straight via your wrist. In contrast Coros Pace 3 Coros Pace 3 has more basic notification features and requires users to manually move and drop your own music onto the computer.
Absence in App Store for Coros Pace 3
It’s important to remember it is the Coros Pace 3 does not come with an app store, like that of the Garmin Forerunner 265. It doesn’t be able to access additional watch faces or apps to alter your experience with your watch. However Coros Pace 3 Coros Pace 3 still offers various options and functions without the requirement for additional apps.
Highlighting Streaming Service Support on Garmin Forerunner 265
One of the main advantages for one of the main advantages offered by Garmin Forerunner 265 is its support for streaming services. It allows you to connect your watch to services such as Spotify and stream music through your wrist without having to carry an iPhone. This is particularly useful for running or workouts in which you don’t need to carry your phone around with you.
Overall, it’s a good choice. Garmin Forerunner 265 offers a more extensive and sophisticated smartwatch experience when compared to Coros Pace 3. Coros Pace 3. With features such as notification view as well as music player support as well as an application store the Garmin has more features and customizable options.
Battery Life
When comparing the battery performance of the Coros Pace 3 and the Garmin Forerunner 265, it’s important to note the significant differences between the two. The Coros Pace 3 offers superior battery life due to its LCD display and efficient power management. Typically, it can last about a week on a single charge with regular use. On the other hand, the Garmin Forerunner 265, with its more energy-consuming AMOLED display, can still last about a week with typical exercise usage, though its perpetual mode can drain the battery faster.
While the Garmin Forerunner 265’s AMOLED display delivers a more vibrant and vivid experience, it does impact battery life more significantly. If battery longevity is a priority, the Coros Pace 3 emerges as a better option. It includes a raise-to-wake gesture feature, allowing users to turn on the display by lifting their wrist, which significantly conserves battery life compared to always-on settings.
Conversely, the Garmin Forerunner 265 lacks a raise-to-wake gesture, meaning users will need to deactivate the always-on display to extend battery life. In standby mode, the Coros Pace 3 also has an advantage, drawing less power than the Garmin Forerunner 265 and therefore lasting longer between charges, even when not actively used for tracking. This makes the Coros Pace 3 a more efficient choice for those concerned about frequent charging.
Price
The Coros Pace 3 is the most affordable choice, and offers high value for its features. Along with that Garmin Forerunner 265 comes with an expensive price tag. One of the major reasons behind the higher cost for Garmin Forerunner 265 is that Garmin has to do with its AMOLED LCD. It can increase the price of the watch.
Coros Pace 3 price starts at $229.00
Garmin Forerunner 265 price starts at $449.45
Although prices vary but it’s important to know that both watches come with similar features. Both offer precise GPS tracking and heart rate monitoring and analysis of training which makes them ideal for those who run a lot.
Conclusion!
When choosing between the Coros Pace 3 and the Garmin Forerunner 265, consider your priorities and what you’re looking to get out of a smartwatch. The Coros Pace 3 is more budget-friendly, ideal for those conscious of price without sacrificing quality. It features an LCD display aimed at extending battery life and offers basic smartwatch functionalities, making it a durable choice for the long haul.
On the other hand, the Garmin Forerunner 265 offers an AMOLED display, providing a richer, more vibrant viewing experience. It’s equipped with a responsive touchscreen and advanced training features, catering to users seeking a more comprehensive and user-friendly running and fitness tracker.
The Forerunner 265 also enhances the smartwatch experience with notification displays, music support, and other sophisticated features.
Both watches offer touchscreen capabilities, accurate GPS tracking, and reliable heart rate monitoring, but the Garmin Forerunner 265 takes the lead in offering a more enhanced experience right out of the box. However, if battery longevity is crucial, the Coros Pace 3 excels with its efficient LCD screen and extended battery life. Ultimately, your choice should align with your specific needs, whether it’s for advanced fitness tracking, everyday use, or value for money.
