10 Major Reasons Not To Buy Apple Vision Pro. The Apple Vision Pro, Apple’s latest foray into spatial computing, has garnered attention, but it’s not without its drawbacks. As consumers and tech enthusiasts eagerly anticipate each new release from Apple, it’s crucial to approach these devices with a critical eye.
The Apple Vision Pro, weighing between 600 and 650 grams, is nearly as heavy as a 12.9-inch iPad Pro, which weighs 682 grams. Despite the Dual Loop strap designed to reduce the strain, the headset’s front-loaded weight causes discomfort. Reviewers have noted fatigue after using the device for even brief periods, making its weight a significant drawback. Check out 10 Major Reasons Not To Buy Apple Vision Pro.
Table of Contents
Reason 1: First Generation Drawbacks
Apple’s Vision Pro is their first generation spatial computer, which essentially functions as a VR headset. Being the first of its kind, there are bound to be some quirks and issues that arise. Historically, Apple’s new products have often faced challenges and controversies, such as the antenna gate and the bending of the iPhone 6. It’s always wise to wait and see how the product evolves and if any major issues arise before making a purchase.
Reason 2: Ridiculous Price
The Vision Pro comes with a hefty price tag of $3,500. For most people, that amount of money could cover a month’s worth of rent or mortgage. By purchasing it, you’re essentially giving Apple the message that such a high price is acceptable. While there may be valid reasons for professionals to invest in the Vision Pro, the average consumer may find it difficult to justify the cost, especially considering more affordable options like the Quest 3.
Reason 3: Limited Storage
The base model of the Vision Pro, priced at $3,500, only offers 256 GB of storage. To upgrade to 1 TB, you need to shell out an additional $400. This seems like a steep increase for just double the storage capacity. Apple could have made the base storage more reasonable or provided expandable storage options to offer more flexibility to consumers.
Reason 4: Questionable Field of View (FOV)
Apple has been secretive about the exact field of view (FOV) numbers for the Vision Pro. This lack of transparency raises concerns, especially considering the headset’s high price tag. Users have reported that the FOV is not as impressive as expected, and it falls short compared to more affordable options like the Quest 3. Consumers deserve clear and accurate information about the FOV when considering such a significant investment.
Reason 5: Poor Weight Distribution
The Vision Pro’s weight distribution is not ideal. The battery pack is attached with a wire that hangs on the side of the headset, causing most of the weight to be concentrated in the front. This can lead to discomfort, especially during extended use. While some users may find it tolerable, others have reported discomfort after just two hours of wearing the headset. Apple could have designed the weight distribution to be more balanced and ergonomic.
Reason 6: FaceTime Calling Limitations
Although FaceTime calling on the Vision Pro is still in the beta stage and improvements can be expected, the current experience feels lackluster. The graphics quality is not up to par, giving it an outdated look. While Apple will likely improve this feature in future updates, it’s important to consider its current limitations.
Reason 7: Unnecessary Eye Features
The Vision Pro includes eyes on the headset, which serve no practical purpose and may even make it look comical. These unnecessary features contribute to the high cost of the headset. Most users have never expressed a desire for eyes on their VR headset, making it an odd and unnecessary addition.
Reason 8: Inconvenient Charging Port
The charging port on the Vision Pro is a massive lightning connector, rather than the more common and versatile USB-C. While the battery pack can be charged using USB-C, the headset itself can only be connected to the battery pack using the lightning connector. This means users are left with a bulky brick hanging from their headset, limiting convenience and portability.
Reason 9: Limited Software Availability
The Vision Pro’s software, Vision OS, is still in its early stages and offers limited app availability. While there are some apps available that are direct copies from the iPad, entertainment options like Netflix are not yet supported. This lack of software compatibility restricts the range of experiences and entertainment available on the headset. In contrast, more affordable options like the Quest 3 offer a wider selection of apps and entertainment options.
Reason 10: Quest 3 Comparison
It’s hard to ignore the fact that the Quest 3 offers many of the same features as the Vision Pro, with some users even claiming that the Quest 3 has more features. While the Vision Pro may have a slightly clearer display and better video clarity, it’s not a significant improvement considering the substantial price difference. The Quest 3 offers a more affordable alternative with a comparable experience.
FAQ
Q: Is the Vision Pro worth the high price tag?
A: The value of the Vision Pro ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. While it offers impressive features and display quality, the high cost may not be justified for the average consumer.
Q: Are there any alternatives to the Vision Pro?
A: Yes, the Quest 3 is often considered a viable alternative with similar features and a more affordable price point.
Q: Can the Vision Pro’s storage be expanded?
A: Unfortunately, the Vision Pro does not offer expandable storage options. Users must choose between the limited storage capacities available.
Q: Is the weight distribution of the Vision Pro comfortable?
A: The weight distribution can be a subjective experience. While some users find it tolerable, others have reported discomfort after extended use.
Q: Can the Vision Pro be used for FaceTime calling?
A: Yes, FaceTime calling is supported on the Vision Pro. However, the current graphics quality may not meet expectations, but improvements are expected in future updates.
